“An Inconvenient
Website”
Learn the
Truth about the Subverting of America © Nov. 29, 2007
HOPEFULLY I CAN HELP
CONNECT THE DOTS
“The real battle in this Country is
not Republican vs Democrat or Liberal vs Conservative
it is Individualism vs Collectivism a battle between Capitalism and Socialism.” Bill Wink 12/8/10
"The
Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the
truth. ... Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to
see it for yourself."
|
The Truth As I Know It
To Be Dear Friend, IN JUNE
2005 I POSTED A PIECE CALLED THE “RED PILL” I TITLED
IT THE “RED PILL” BECAUSE BACK THEN THIS ALL SEEMED SO UNREAL TO BE WRITING
ABOUT AND IN THE MOVIE ‘THE MATRIX’ TAKING THE ‘RED PILL’ ALLOWED YOU TO SEE
REALITY. SINCE
THEN WE HAVE REALLY GONE DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE AND WE HAVE DISCOVERED THINGS
OUR PARENT’S GENERATION WOULDN’T BELIEVE POSSIBLE. ALTHOUGH
OUR LEADERS HAVE BEEN SPEAKING TO US ABOUT WHAT WAS COMING, WE WERE NOT
LISTENING CLOSELY ENOUGH AND WE WEREN’T THINKING ON A GLOBAL SCALE SO WE COULD
PLACE REAL CREDIBILITY ON WHAT THEY WERE TELLING US. NOW,
TODAY, WE REALIZE MOVIES LIKE THE MATRIX, 1984, AND OTHERS WERE TELLING US
OF CERTAIN REALITIES THAT COULD AND DO EXIST. I.E. In the sci-fi
classic "The Matrix" there is a "green" world, the world
inside the Matrix, and a "blue" world of dreamy illusion that feeds
the Matrix. The protagonist Neo,
the seeker of truth and reality, must take a red pill or a blue pill to
decide which future he will live in. The blue pill will let him stay in his
dream world, while the red pill will bring him into the terrible reality of
the green world of the Matrix. The central problem
facing humanity in the movie is delusion. At one point in the
film the rebel hero, Morpheus, tells the protagonist Neo that most people
don't understand the illusory nature of the Matrix. Morpheus says: "The
Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the
truth. ... Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to
see it for yourself." What the hero finds
in his reality is a ruling elite of artificial intelligence beings who tell
the hero finally what they think of mankind:
"There is another organism on this planet that follows the same
pattern [as humanity]: a virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet.
You are a plague, and we are the cure." The citizens of the
United States need to decide whether to take the red pill or the blue pill,
because the "green cure" may not be to their liking. As a matter of fact,
the United States has been experiencing a "green" cure for some
time. What is at stake in the course we choose is our freedom, our way of
life and our humanity. (The “Complete” Green Matrix © Diane Alden) FOR 5 AND
ONE HALF YEARS I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SHOW YOU WHAT I SAW BACK THEN. AND THAT WAS THAT THE WORLD WE WERE LIVING IN
WAS NOT WHAT WE THOUGHT IT WAS. AND THAT FORCES HAD BEEN AT WORK FOR OVER A
CENTURY MOVING US TOWARD A WORLD OLIGARCHY RULED BY COLLECTIVIST. I’M STILL STRUGGLING TO TELL YOU
TODAY TO RAISE THE ALARM. BUT JUST AS GLENN BECK SAID; AFTER SOME LENGTH OF TIME,
FOLKS WOULD EVEN TELL PAUL REVERE ‘ENOUGH’. I HOPE I’M NOT THERE YET.
TODAY
THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE READILY AVAILABLE FOR CONSUMPTION THAT IT WILL ALLOW
ME TO PEAL PART OF THE ONION AWAY. I HAVE
ALWAYS FOCUSED ON THE UNITED NATIONS’ AGENDA 21 BECAUSE I CONSIDER IT A
MALIGNANT CANCER THAT IS VERY DRAMATICALLY EATING AWAY AT THE FOUNDATION OF
OUR COUNTRY AND NOW WE ARE REALLY BEGINNING TO SEE THAT OUR FREEDOMS ARE
INDEED ON LIFE SUPPORT AND WE MUST ACT SOON TO SAVE OUR LIBERTIES OR LOSE
THEM FOREVER. HOWEVER, UNITED
NATIONS’ AGENDA 21, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A MAJOR PART OF THE PLAN FOR WORLD
GOVERNANCE IS ONLY ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE. The
Council on Foreign Relations was spawned from the secret
society created by Cecil Rhodes – which still exists today, that originally
it was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company, and that its primary purpose is
to promote world government based on the model of collectivism. The power centers of the United States
– including both major political parties – are controlled by members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This,
in turn, is controlled by a submerged Round
Table Group, which is associated with other Round Tables in other
countries. These are extensions of a secret society founded by Cecil Rhodes and still in operation
today. I call it the Fabian Network,
not because these people are members of the Fabian Society, for most of them are not. It is because
they share the Fabian ideology of global collectivism and the Fabian strategy
of patient gradualism. Is this reality? If I were in your position, being
exposed to all of this for the first time, I probably would think, “Oh come
on! This can’t be true! If it were, I would have read about it in the
newspaper.” Well, before you dismiss it as
just another conspiracy theory, I’d like to refer you one more time to
Professor Quigley. He said this: I know of the operation of this
network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two
years during the 1960’s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its aims and have for much of my life been close
to it and to many of its instruments. In general my chief difference of opinion
is that it wishes to remain unknown.2 1 Quigley, Tragedy, pp.
1247–1248.
Yes! Ladies and Gentlemen,
this is reality! THESE PEOPLE HAVE NO ALLEGIANCE TO
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THAT OUR FOUNDERS LEFT FOR US, EVEN THE ONES WHO
CLAIM TO BE AMERICANS. THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JUST A
WEEK AGO HAD THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND ITS AMENDMENTS READ TO THEM
AND BY THE WEEKEND WERE CALLING FOR LEGISLATION TO CURB FREE SPEECH WHICH
LIES AT THE VERY HEART OF OUR REPUBLIC. THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE THE CHOSEN
ONES, THE ILLUMINATED ONES AND THAT IT IS THEIR PLACE IN HISTORY TO SAVE THE
WORLD FROM THE UNWASHED RABBLE OF THE MASSES. TODAY, ONE YEAR AFTER THE
EARTHQUAKE IN HAITI, TENS OF THOUSANDS ARE STILL SUFFERING YET MONEY HAS NOT
BEEN AN ISSUE, SO WHAT’S THE PLAN?
WHERE ARE THE ILLUMINATED ONES THAT ARE GOING TO LEAD THE WORLD? WHAT HAPPENED TO BILL CLINTON AND
GEORGE BUSH? ONE MUST WONDER, IS WHAT WE ARE
SEEING HAPPEN IN HAITI “THE PLAN”, THE PLAN FOR SAVING THE WORLD FROM THE
UNWASHED RABBLE OF THE MASSES? WAS OUR FAILURE IN OUR RESPONSE TO
KATRINA PART OF THE ‘PLAN’ TOO? HOW ABOUT THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL DISASTER,
THE DELAYING OF REINSTITUTING OFF SHORE DRILLING AND THE SENDING OF BILLIONS
OF DOLLARS TO BRAZIL’S OIL INDUSTRY.
IS THIS ALL PART OF THE PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH?
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR TO PRESIDENT CARTER,
CFR MEMBER AND FIRST DIRECTOR OF THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION AND AN AMERICAN. HE WRITES OF A SOCIETY CONTROLLED BY A POWER ELITE IN HIS 1970 BOOK, BETWEEN
TWO AGES: AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE TECHNETRONIC ERA. YOU WILL FIND MUCH OF TODAY’S WORLD IN HIS
WRITINGS OF 35 YEARS AGO. “The technotronic era involves the
gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be
dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be
possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and
maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal
information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous
retrieval by the authorities. Today we are again witnessing the
emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut across national
boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the
more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in
spirit and outlook.... Within a few years the rebels in
the more advanced countries who today have the most visibility will be joined
by a new generation making its claim to power in government and business...
accepting as routine managerial processes current innovations such as
planning-programming-budgeting systems (PPBS) ... A national information grid
that will integrate existing electronic data banks is already being developed....
[the Internet] The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western
Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a
common educational program, for the adoption of common academic standards.... The
nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty.
... In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has
already been achieved, but further
progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts
to shape a new world monetary
structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable
American position. WHY IS THE UNITED STATES, WITH
LITTLE HELP FROM NATO, NATION BUILDING IN AFGHANISTAN? THAT IS WHAT WE ARE
DOING YOU KNOW. THE WORLD IS DRAGGING AFGHANISTAN KICKING AND SCREAMING INTO
THE 21ST CENTURY SO THE WORLD CAN CONTROL THEM AND THEIR RESOURCES.
AND PLEASE DON’T MAKE THE MISTAKE OF THINKING IT IS AMERICA DOING THIS
BECAUSE AMERICA WANTS IT, THAT IS ONLY PARTIALLY TRUE, IT’S THE POWER BROKERS
WHO WANT IT AND WE ARE JUST THE ONES PAYING THE PRICE. Winter,
1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations
by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts: "It
is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive
sovereignty no longer stands...Underlying the rights of the
individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty
that resides in all humanity...It is a sense that increasingly finds
expression in the gradual expansion of international law...In this setting
the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted." July
18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los
Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: "What Congress will have before it is
not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new
international system...a first step toward a new world
order." August
23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he
was at Oxford University, says in a C-Span interview: "...it is, of
course the case that there is a ruling class in this country,
and that it has allies internationally." October
30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece
about the role of the CFR's media members: "Their
membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling
class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret
foreign policy for the United States; they help make it." January/February,
1994 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior
Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g.
Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
"assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50
years...They ascended to power during World War II...This was as it should
be. National security and the national interest, they argued must
transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up
America...How was this small band of Atlantic-minded
internationalists able to triumph ...Eastern internationalists were able to
shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions...As long as the
Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the
public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making
system." 1994
-- In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program,
there was a section called "Global Governance For the 21st
Century". The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill
Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report
said: "Mankind's problems can no longer be solved by national government.
What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by
strengthening the United Nations system." 1995
-- The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year,
sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San
Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-who
from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George
Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the
oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term "global
governance" is now used in place of "new world order" since
the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod
for opponents of global government. 1996 -- The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for "global governance," calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000. YOU’VE
HEARD OF MOST OF THESE DIFFERENT GROUPS AT DIFFERENT TIMES BUT YOU PROBABLY
DIDN’T KNOW THEY ARE THE POWER BROKERS OF THE WORLD. WHO RUNS THE WORLD? we are again witnessing the
emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut across national
boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the
more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in
spirit and outlook.... ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI,
1970
The
Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership
organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its
members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators
and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in
order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices
facing the United States and other countries. Founded
in 1921, the Council takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. The
Council on Foreign Relations' David Rockefeller Studies Program — CFR's
"think tank" — is composed of about fifty adjunct and full-time
scholars and practitioners (called "fellows") The
program focuses on the most significant foreign policy issues facing the
United States and the international community today, including conflict in
the Middle East, rising powers in Asia, and globalization.
The fellows' work covers all major geographical regions of the world —
Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and the Polar regions —
as well as the following program areas: energy security and climate change, global health, international
institutions and global governance,
national security and defense, science and technology, and U.S. foreign policy. In addition, the Studies
Program hosts two research centers: The Maurice R. Greenberg Center for
Geoeconomics and the Center for Preventive Action. The
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is first and foremost a membership
organization. With more than 4,300 members, CFR's ranks include top
government officials, renowned scholars, business leaders, acclaimed
journalists, prominent attorneys, and a host of distinguished nonprofit
professionals. http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html Bilderberg
takes its name from the hotel in Holland, where the first meeting took place
in May 1954. That pioneering meeting grew out of the concern expressed by leading
citizens on both sides of the Atlantic that Western Europe and North America
were not working together as closely as they should on common problems of
critical importance. It was felt that regular, off-the-record discussions
would help create a better understanding of the complex forces and major
trends affecting Western nations in the difficult post-war period. In short,
Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international
forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding
enhanced. Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference. At the
meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy
statements issued. Since 1954, fifty-seven conferences have been held. For
each meeting, the names of the participants as well as the agenda are made
Public and available to the press. There
usually are about 120 participants of whom about two-thirds come from Europe
and the balance from North America. About one-third is from government and
politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and
communications. Participants attend Bilderberg in a private and not an
official capacity. The 58th
Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 - 6 June 2010. The
Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber
Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical
Science, EU-US relations. Approximately 130 participants will attend of whom
about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. The Club of Rome is an
independent, not-for-profit organization with an international membership. It
draws on the insights and expertise of its members from all regions of the world,
from different cultures and histories, from different fields of science and
public policy and from academia, civil society and the corporate sector.
Since its founding forty years ago, it has been promoting interdisciplinary
analysis, dialogue and action on the fundamental, systemic challenges which
are determining the future of humanity. The work
of the active, international members is complemented by around 50 honorary members
and 40 Associate Members and by the activities of 33 National Associations throughout
the world. It is
launching a major international cooperative programme on the broad theme: “A
New Path for World Development.” This will engage thinkers, practitioners and
activists in key regions and countries to undertake interdisciplinary and
multicultural thinking on crucial global issues. Experts, universities and organizations
from major emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, Nigeria and
Russia will be engaged in the programme, as will leading personalities from
Europe, Japan and the United States, and from Africa, East Asia, Latin
America and the Middle East. 1.Environment
and Resources: This cluster relates climate
change, peak oil, ecosystems and
water. Radical and rapid social and economic transformations will be needed
to avert runaway climate change and
ecological breakdown; 2.
Globalisation: This cluster relates
interdependence, distribution of wealth
and income, demographic change, employment, trade and finance. Rising
inequalities and imbalances associated with the present path of globalisation risk the breakdown of the world
economic and financial systems; 3.
World Development: This cluster relates sustainable
development, demographic growth, poverty, environmental stress, food
production, health and employment. The scandal of abiding poverty,
deprivation, inequity and exclusion in a wealthy world must be corrected; 4.
Social Transformation: This cluster relates social change, gender equity,
values and ethics, religion and spirituality, culture, identity and
behaviour. The values and behaviour on which the present path of world
development is based must change if peace and progress are to be preserved
within the tightening human and environmental limits; 5.
Peace and Security: This cluster relates justice, democracy, governance, solidarity, security and peace. The
present path of world development risks alienation, polarization, violence
and conflict; the preservation of peace is vital in itself but is also a
precondition for progress and for the resolution of the issues which threaten
the future. Royal Institute of International
Affairs Chatham
House, home of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a
world-leading institute for the debate and analysis of international issues. Chatham
House was founded in 1920 and granted its Royal Charter in 1926. It is based
in St James's Square in London. The Chatham House Rule, famous worldwide for
facilitating free speech and confidentiality at meetings, originated here. Our
mission is to be a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed
debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world
for all. Chatham
House pursues this mission: by
drawing on our membership to promote open as well as confidential debates
about significant developments in international affairs and about the context
and content of policy responses; by
producing independent and rigorous analysis of critical global, regional and
country-specific challenges; by
offering new ideas to decision-makers and -shapers on how these could best be
tackled from the near to long term. 'Chatham
House' is both the name of the building and the name by which the Royal
Institute of International Affairs is widely known. In
recognition of this, Council in 2004 decided to adopt 'Chatham House' as the
primary identity for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which
remains the formal name for legal and financial purposes. The
Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe
(European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to
foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world
with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system.
Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for
successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be
completed in 2012 The
“growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral
Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.”
Our
membership has widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the
Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, including in 2009 both Chinese
and Indian members. Mexican members have been added to the North American
Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of
the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a
number of participants from other key areas. http://www.trilateral.org/download/file/TC%20list%201-11.pdf YOU DON’T
NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW ALL OF THIS WORKS YOU JUST NEED TO ACCEPT IT AS THE
REALITY IT IS. AND YOU MUST RECOGNIZE THEIR PLAN FOR THE FUTURE DOES NOT
INCLUDE THE AMERICA YOU GREW UP IN. ONLY THEN, MAYBE YOU WILL BE MOTIVATED TO
SAVE THE REPUBLIC WE CALL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SO HOW DO
YOU STAND UP AGAINST ALL OF THIS? WELL, ALL
OF THIS, IS “COLLECTIVISM” AND THE OPPOSITE OF COLLECTIVISM IS “INDIVIDUALISM”. THE
PURVEYOR OF “COLLECTIVISM” IS SOCIALISM, THE PURVEYOR OF “INDIVIDUALISM” IS
CAPITALISM SO YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE SO YOU CAN MOVE TO
DEFEAT COLLECTIVISM AND ADVANCE INDIVIDUALISM BY DEFEATING SOCIALISM AND
ADVANCING CAPITALISM. “INDIVIDUALISM”
IS THE CORRECT CHOICE, THE RIGHT WAY, THE WAY GOD INTENDED AND I SAY THAT
BECAUSE OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. THE TEN
COMMANDMENTS THAT WERE HANDED DOWN TO MORTAL MAN WERE DIRECTED TO EACH AND
EVERY “INDIVIDUAL”. THE TEN COMMANDMENTS WERE NOT ABOUT THE COLLECTIVE
ACTIVITIES OF MAN THEY WERE ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES OF EVERY MAN. OUR
FOUNDERS KNEW AND UNDERSTOOD THAT, THAT IS WHY THE CONSTITUTION IS ABOUT
PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL FROM THE COLLECTIVE. INTRINSIC
NATURE OF RIGHTS I
believe that only individuals have rights, not the collective group; that
these rights are intrinsic to each individual, not granted by the state; for
if the state has the power to grant them, it also has the power to deny them,
and that is incompatible with personal liberty I
believe that a just government derives its power solely from the governed.
Therefore, the state must never presume to do anything beyond what individual
citizens also have the right to do. Otherwise, the state is a power unto
itself and becomes the master instead of the servant of society. SUPREMACY
OF THE INDIVIDUAL I
believe that one of the greatest threats to freedom is to allow any group, no
matter its numeric superiority, to deny the rights of the minority; and that
one of the primary functions of just government is to protect each individual
from the greed and passion of the majority. FREEDOM
OF CHOICE I
believe that desirable social and economic objectives are better achieved by
voluntary action than by coercion of law. I believe that social tranquility
and brotherhood are better achieved by tolerance, persuasion, and the power
of good example than by coercion of law. I believe that those in need are
better served by charity, which is the giving of one's own money, than by
welfare, which is the giving of other people's money through coercion of law. EQUALITY
UNDER LAW I
believe that all citizens should be equal under law, regardless of their
national origin, race, religion, gender, education, economic status, life
style, or political opinion. Likewise, no class should be given preferential
treatment, regardless of the merit or popularity of its cause. To favor one
class over another is not equality under law. PROPER
ROLE OF GOVERNMENT I
believe that the proper role of government is negative, not positive;
defensive, not aggressive. It is to protect, not to provide; for if the state
is granted the power to provide for some, it must also be able to take from
others, and once that power is granted, there are those who will seek it for
their advantage. It always leads to legalized plunder and loss of freedom. If
government is powerful enough to give us everything we want, it is also
powerful enough to take from us everything we have. Therefore, the proper
function of government is to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its
citizens; nothing more. That government is best which governs least. G. Edward Griffin GOD HELP
US SAVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. © Bill Wink
January 12, 2011 |
SPACE
The
COLLECTIVIST’S Flow Chart
“Freedom
of speech is the sun light that exposes the vermin that hide in the cracks of
society and the Internet is a new tool of that freedom.” Bill Wink
Free counters provided
by Andale
Middletown, CA Old West Antiques
|
Agenda 21 is not the “Bill of Rights”.
It is not “The Declaration of Independence”. And it is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It has never been decided on by the
American people that “Agenda 21” should be our new bible. Our guiding light into the 21st
century. It is being pushed on us by a
bunch of self righteous elitist like Nancy Pelosi. It empowers those who agree and
indoctrinates those who do not, and you are going to think you are having a
bad dream when it comes into your home. |
Casper Wink,
married to Gertrude Kemp, was also one of the early settlers. They reared six
children; Catherine, the eldest daughter, born in 1728, and Theobald, the
eldest son, in 1733. The latter was the father of sons named Philip, John,
Peter, Jacob (a Revolutionary soldier) and Dewalt. His daughters married Isaac
Roberts, Jacob Levan, John Heidenreich (father of Judge Wm. S. Heidenreich),
John Hausman and Daniel Kemp. A brother of Theobald Wink, John Peter, born in
1745, went to the Revolutionary War and never returned. Dewalt Wink, son of
Theobald, born in 1776, was married to a daughter of George A. Fister, also a
Revolutionary soldier, and who was the grandfather of Colonel Thomas A. Fister.
He was the father of eleven sons and two daughters, among the former being John
G. Wink, of Kutztown. Casper Wink was a Catholic and a faithful colonist,
having his allegiance certified, which reads as follows:
"I hereby certify that Casper Wink, of Berks County, State of
Pennsylvania, hath voluntarily taken and subscribed the oath of allegiance and
Fidelity, as directed by an Act of General Assembly
of Pennsylvania, passed on the 13th day of June A.D. 1777.
"Witness my hand and seal, the 26th day of May, A.D. 1778.
Peter Trexler, Esq."