“An Inconvenient
Website”
Learn the
Truth about the Subverting of America © Nov. 29, 2007
HOPEFULLY I CAN HELP
CONNECT THE DOTS
The
COLLECTIVIST’S Flow Chart
|
What
is Sustainable Development? On
Google there are 4,610,000 results to the search question “sustainable
development definition”. Of
that 4.6 million plus answers the number 2
answer is found on the website
www.middletownca.com. There are
4,660,000 results to the search question “definition sustainable development”. Of
that 4.6 million plus answers the number 9
answer is found on the website
middletownca.com. The page on middletownca.com
that holds the #2 and #9 answer to the search question was written and published by me and
it is as follows: The
presented definition of sustainable development by those who are misleading
you is: “Development that
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs. It contains within it two key concepts:
the concept of "needs", in particular the essential needs of the
world's poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and the idea of
limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the
environment's ability to meet present and the future needs. (Brundtland
Commission, 1987). ...” This
popular phrase (above) is a political statement wrapped in a blanket of
environmentalism. It is socialistic in
nature and addresses redistribution of wealth. The truth
in what I have said is found in Maurice
Strong’s address to the opening session of the Rio Conference (Earth
Summit II) in 1992, when he stated that industrialized countries have: “…developed and
benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which
have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and
consumption patterns of the affluent middle class -- involving high meat
intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of
fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban
housing -- are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less
geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns." The
United Nations produced a product to address the Brutland Commission and
Maurice Strong, it is called Agenda
21. It is forty chapters
consisting of over three hundred pages and the commission the UN formed to
implement Agenda 21 is; the Commission on Sustainable
Development. Therefore,
the real definition of ‘sustainable development’ is: Agenda 21, the United
Nations plan for the future of the world. Agenda 21
and sustainable development are one and the same, make no mistake in thinking
otherwise. The words ‘sustainable
development’ just sound less ominous than Agenda 21. Sustainable
development will force a “re-think” in your community, by local citizens, of
every aspect of American life. It will
happen during open dialog and because it does, change will become inevitable
as change then becomes the “rule of life”.
The “rule of life” is: Every idea irrepressibly breeds its opposite
and the two merge into a synthesis which in turn produces its own
contradiction. This is called the “Hegelian Dialect” of thesis, antithesis
and synthesis. It will be called: “reaching
consensus”. Its goal
then is to change the way society ‘thinks’, especially about
individuality. It directs you toward
community thinking which will then undermine individual liberties. Think
about it; when you are the freest country in the world and change is forced
upon you, you can only end up less free.
Therefore, sustainable development, which forces change upon us, means
we will only become less free. You could
say sustainable development’s definition is a blue print on how to remove
individual liberties through misguided consensus. (I wrote this in February 2006 and
posted it on the Internet and it has been in the top 10 search answers since.) Bill Wink © January 2, 2011 Return
to HOME |
space
SPACE
“Freedom of speech is the sun light that
exposes the vermin that hide in the cracks of society and the Internet is a new
tool of that freedom.”
Bill
Wink
Free counters provided
by Andale
Middletown, CA Old West Antiques
|
Agenda 21 is not the “Bill of Rights”.
It is not “The Declaration of Independence”. And it is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It has never been decided on by the
American people that “Agenda 21” should be our new bible. Our guiding light into the 21st
century. It is being pushed on us by a
bunch of self righteous elitist like Nancy Pelosi. It empowers those who agree and
indoctrinates those who do not, and you are going to think you are having a
bad dream when it comes into your home. |
Casper Wink,
married to Gertrude Kemp, was also one of the early settlers. They reared six
children; Catherine, the eldest daughter, born in 1728, and Theobald, the
eldest son, in 1733. The latter was the father of sons named Philip, John,
Peter, Jacob (a Revolutionary soldier) and Dewalt. His daughters married Isaac
Roberts, Jacob Levan, John Heidenreich (father of Judge Wm. S. Heidenreich),
John Hausman and Daniel Kemp. A brother of Theobald Wink, John Peter, born in
1745, went to the Revolutionary War and never returned. Dewalt Wink, son of
Theobald, born in 1776, was married to a daughter of George A. Fister, also a
Revolutionary soldier, and who was the grandfather of Colonel Thomas A. Fister.
He was the father of eleven sons and two daughters, among the former being John
G. Wink, of Kutztown. Casper Wink was a Catholic and a faithful colonist,
having his allegiance certified, which reads as follows:
"I hereby certify that Casper Wink, of Berks County, State of
Pennsylvania, hath voluntarily taken and subscribed the oath of allegiance and
Fidelity, as directed by an Act of General Assembly
of Pennsylvania, passed on the 13th day of June A.D. 1777.
"Witness my hand and seal, the 26th day of May, A.D. 1778.
Peter Trexler, Esq."