**Individualism is not opposed to man living in society.
Individualism is opposed to man living in society as a slave**
Inconvenient: not convenient especially in giving trouble or annoyance:
the truth can be problematic, inconvenient.



“An Inconvenient
Website”
Learn the Truth about the Subverting of America © Nov. 29, 2007
Only
those hiding behind a lie fear the TRUTH
The
POWER of www.Bill-Wink.com comes from the TRUTH
Prophecy points to great change by December 21,
2012. It is predicted that by that date,
the world will end as we know it today.
Could that prophecy and date mean the shift to world governance? Or could that date mean something else?
“By the year 2012, these changes must be
fully integrated into our economic and political life." 1992 Maurice Strong architect of Agenda 21 – Sustainable
Development
“The real battle in this Country is
not Republican vs Democrat or Liberal vs Conservative
it is Individualism vs Collectivism
a battle between Capitalism and Socialism.” Bill Wink 12/8/10

FINALLY IT HAS
BEEN MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR!
Are they
Socialists or are they Capitalists?
THANK YOU - ONE
NATION RALLY - FOR CLARIFYING THE ISSUE
|
THE ONE NATION RALLY This is a short list of those organizations
that say they are politically aligned with socialist ideals. THE APOLLO ALLIANCE, SEIU, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA,
NAACP, COMMUNIST PARTY USA, INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST ORGANIZATION, GREY
PANTHERS, TEAMSTERS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD, PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS ACTION
FUND, WELFARE RIGHTS COMMITTEE, AFL-CIO, NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER
EQUALITY, GREEN PARTY, SINGLE PAYER ACTION NETWORK, There
are more listed below. Here
are some photos from the Democrats answer to the TEA Party. From their rally called “One Nation” held
on 10/2/2010
This sign says Capitalism is failing Socialism is the
alternative
These pamphlets were available to attendees
There is no missing what these folks believe |
SPACE
|
Dear Friend, Now that I have
looked at the pictures of the One Nation rally held yesterday and saw who
participated, it is extremely clear to me that the party titles of Republican
or Democrat are not about being liberal or conservative (which are really
moral positions). Instead, as was
shown as clear as could be shown yesterday, the Democrat Party believes in
the tenets of Marxism, socialism and communism and promotes those as the
correct direction for our Country while they believe by their signs etc (and
I believe too), the Republican Party is just the exact opposite which means
the Republican Party stands for capitalism. You may
disagree with a certain party platform on a moral issue, like abortion, but
voting is really about what kind of society you want to live in not what moral
position you hold. If you want big
government run social control then you should vote democrat, but if you want
less control and more personal freedom then you should vote republican. You can have
liberal moral values but still want a society that has smaller government,
lower taxes and more personal freedom or you can have conservative moral
values and want bigger government, higher taxes and more social programs.
Your vote is really to elect those whose political alignment will provide the
kind of society you want to live in, currently socialist or capitalist. People who
don’t like the current political party options are drawn to the Tea Party
because it is not about moral issues, which are very divisive; it’s about
smaller government, lower taxes (actually doing away with the “progressive”
income tax) and Constitutional protection of individual rights and freedoms
and that is why it is more aligned with the republicans because that is not
what the democrats promise. In the past,
the issues that seemed to have made people line up behind a party have been
moral issues not societal governing issues, but maybe this time we can find
the path leading us to what we want. This time when you vote, think about
whether you want capitalism or socialism because that is exactly what you are
doing anyway even though you may think you are voting liberal, conservative
or moderate. (copyright) Bill Wink 10/3/2010 |
“Freedom
of speech is the sun light that exposes the vermin that hide in the cracks of society
and the Internet is a new tool of that freedom.” Bill Wink
THESE ARE SOME OF THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE
ONE NATION RALLY OF SOCIALISTS









![]()





For a full list click here
(this link has been changed, it no longer goes to the
complete list of supporters. I wonder why?)
HOPEFULLY I CAN HELP
YOU CONNECT THE DOTS
The
COLLECTIVIST’S Flow Chart

Free counters provided
by Andale
|
Agenda 21 is not the “Bill
of Rights”. It is not “The Declaration of Independence”. And it is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It has never been decided on by the
American people that “Agenda 21” should be our new bible. Our guiding light into the 21st
century. It is being pushed on us by a
bunch of self righteous elitist like Nancy Pelosi. It empowers those who agree and
indoctrinates those who do not, and you are going to think you are having a
bad dream when it comes into your home. |
Casper Wink,
married to Gertrude Kemp, was also one of the early settlers. They reared six
children; Catherine, the eldest daughter, born in 1728, and Theobald, the
eldest son, in 1733. The latter was the father of sons named Philip, John, Peter,
Jacob (a Revolutionary soldier) and Dewalt. His daughters married Isaac
Roberts, Jacob Levan, John Heidenreich (father of Judge Wm. S. Heidenreich),
John Hausman and Daniel Kemp. A brother of Theobald Wink, John Peter, born in
1745, went to the Revolutionary War and never returned. Dewalt Wink, son of
Theobald, born in 1776, was married to a daughter of George A. Fister, also a
Revolutionary soldier, and who was the grandfather of Colonel Thomas A. Fister.
He was the father of eleven sons and two daughters, among the former being John
G. Wink, of Kutztown. Casper Wink was a Catholic and a faithful colonist,
having his allegiance certified, which reads as follows:
"I hereby certify that
of
"Witness my hand and seal, the 26th day of May, A.D. 1778.
Peter Trexler, Esq."
