“An Inconvenient
Website”
Learn the
Truth about the Subverting of America © Nov. 29, 2007
HOPEFULLY I CAN HELP
CONNECT THE DOTS
The
COLLECTIVIST’S Flow Chart
PLEASE NOTE!
IF YOU ARRIVED HERE SEEKING CERTAIN INFORMATION AND YOU FIND THIS PAGE IS
INADEQUATE - PLEASE TRY THE MAIN INDEX PAGE HERE WHERE YOU WILL FIND 7
CATEGORIES INDEXING OVER 100 PAGES OF INFORMATION ON THIS SITE. THIS PAGE IS
INDEXED HERE, FRONT PAGE IS HERE THANK YOU FOR VISITING!
This
Is Very Troubling
Maybe
we should chug on over to mamby pamby land you jack wagon
|
Our Founders felt the 1st
Amendment was worth dying over, how do you feel? In 15th century
England, where absolute obedience to the Crown was considered essential to public
safety, to call the king a fool or predict his demise was a crime punishable
by death. The
early Americans protested at their peril, for the English common law doctrine
of "seditious libel" had been incorporated into the law of the
American colonies. That doctrine permitted prosecution for "false,
scandalous and malicious writing" that had "the intent to defame or
to bring into contempt or disrepute" a private party or the
government. Moreover, the law did not
even accommodate the truth as a defense. Eventually
the British authorities abandoned seditious libel prosecutions in the
colonies, having concluded that such prosecutions were no longer an effective
tool of repression. James
Madison, Thomas Jefferson and the other framers of the Bill of Rights
believed in the power of reason, the search for truth, and the perfectibility
of human society. Freedom of inquiry
and liberty of expression were clearly essential to the process of debate and
discovery that they viewed as indispensable to the achievement of human
progress. The
philosophers of the day well understood the tendency of government to
perpetuate itself by enacting repressive measures to silence those opposed to
its conduct. They
felt a citizen had the right to "say everything which his passions
suggest; he may employ all his time, and all his talents...to do so, in
speaking against the government matters that are false, scandalous and
malicious," and yet he should be "safe within the sanctuary of the
press." Speech was regarded as beyond the reach of criminal sanctions;
only "overt acts" could be punished. There
are four primary reasons why freedom of expression, which encompasses speech,
the press, assembly and petition, is essential to a free society: First,
freedom of expression is the foundation of self-fulfillment. Second,
freedom of expression is vital to the attainment and advancement of
knowledge. Third,
freedom of expression is necessary to our system of self-government. Fourth,
freedom of expression provides a "check" against possible government
corruption and excess, which seem to be permanent features of the human
condition. Restrictions
on freedom of speech always authorize the government to decide how, and
against whom, the restrictions should apply. The more authority the government
has, the more it will use that authority to suppress unpopular minorities,
criticism and dissent. What forms of
expression are protected by the First Amendment? In addition to
protecting "pure speech," expressed in demonstrations, rallies,
picketing, leaflets, etc., the First Amendment also protects "symbolic
speech" -- that is, nonverbal expression whose main purpose is to
communicate ideas. Freedom
of Expression Now you
know the foundation for and why we have the 1st Amendment to the
Constitution. So how embarrassing is it for anyone who is a Democrat to see
the true colors of their Party these last few days. There
would be no United States of America if the whiners and complainers from
today’s Democrat Party had been the leaders of this Country in the 1700s. There
would have never been talk of revolution or violence. They would
have been content to lick the hands of the King of England. Can you
see today’s Democrats plotting to rebel against England because of “unfair”
taxes when today’s Democrats have never seen a tax they didn’t like. Imagine
today’s Democrats telling anyone of our Founding Fathers to sit down and shut
up as they are doing today to those who dare utter words of disagreement in
the form of dissent. How can
you be an elected official, sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of
the United States, then had that same Constitution read aloud to you just a
couple of days ago and then start whining about some Americans celebrating
their right to freedom of expression and blaming that same protected speech
for an act that had nothing to do with free speech? Today’s
Democrats are upset because folks are using words like “revolution” and “take
back our government”. If that
kind of speech had been limited by fellow Americans in the 1700s we would
still be paying taxes to England and tribute to the monarchy. Of course
socialist world governance is what they seek so why wouldn’t they want to
squash rhetoric that might spark folks into thinking for themselves and
seeing what is truly happening in America today. You know
what makes me sad? The
Whiners do! Maybe we
should chug on over to mamby pamby land you jack wagon. Want a
tissue? Cry baby. You lost. Get over
it. These are issues that concern me and that I will
factor into my personal decision making, however, you must decide everything
for yourself based on what you feel is important, which may be none of the
issues I am concerned about. © Bill Wink
January 11, 2011 |
SPACE
“Freedom of speech is the sun light that
exposes the vermin that hide in the cracks of society and the Internet is a new
tool of that freedom.”
Bill
Wink
“The real battle in this Country is
not Republican vs Democrat or Liberal vs Conservative
it is Individualism vs Collectivism a battle between Capitalism and Socialism.” Bill Wink 12/8/10
Free counters provided
by Andale
Middletown, CA Old West Antiques
|
Agenda 21 is not the “Bill of Rights”.
It is not “The Declaration of Independence”. And it is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It has never been decided on by the
American people that “Agenda 21” should be our new bible. Our guiding light into the 21st
century. It is being pushed on us by a
bunch of self righteous elitist like Nancy Pelosi. It empowers those who agree and indoctrinates
those who do not, and you are going to think you are having a bad dream when
it comes into your home. |
The
foundation of POWER is www.Bill-Wink.com
which is built on the TRUTH
How
does one level the playing field when going against the powerful?
With
the TRUTH
Only those hiding behind a lie fear the TRUTH
Prophecy points to great
change by December 21, 2012. It is
predicted that by that date, the world will end as we know it today. Could that prophecy and date mean the shift
to world governance? Or could that date
mean something else?
“By the year 2012, these changes must be
fully integrated into our economic and political life." 1992 Maurice Strong
architect of Agenda 21 – Sustainable Development